If Contractor Quality Control test results are not used, what is implied regarding the dispute resolution process?

When Contractor Quality Control test results are not utilized, it suggests a lack of reliance on the established quality control measures that are typically governed by contractual agreements between the parties involved. In such a scenario, if these QC tests are deemed unnecessary or are not acknowledged, the implication is that there may not be a need for a formal dispute resolution system. This is because without the foundation of QC results to reference, the basis for disputes becomes weaker, as there may not be quantifiable evidence to support claims or counterclaims regarding the quality of work performed.

In construction contracts, the QC results serve as a benchmark for assessing compliance with specifications. If these results are disregarded, it indicates a potential for projects to proceed without a clear framework for addressing disputes based on these metrics, which could compromise the quality assurance process. Hence, if QC test results are not utilized, it may render a dispute resolution system less critical or even unnecessary.